AI Didn’t Replace Radiologists. It Won’t Replace Plan Reviewers Either.
Last year, The New York Times published a story with a provocative title:“Your A.I. Radiologist Will Not Be With You Soon”.
Explore our 2024 comparative review, your ultimate guide through the top-tier plan review solutions.
Many plan review departments are still relying on a tool that was never designed for the complexity of modern workflows: email.
If this is the case for your office, your routing system likely relies on constant, manual decision-making. A plan comes in; someone determines who needs to see it; they draft an email; add the CC line, attach files or links, and hit send.
The problem? Every single time, critical decisions—like who gets the email, who is included, and whether the right version was sent—is a manual task prone to human error.
At low volume, manual email routing works. It's slow and it creates more work than it needs to, but it works. You know what came in, you know who has it, and you can keep track of where things stand.
But for a busy city or county managing 10, 20, or 50 plan sets a week, email shifts from a minor inconvenience to a significant visibility problem.
Fragmented data silos: To understand the status of a project, you have to reconstruct the timeline manually by digging through sent folders and checking in with staff.
Lack of resource management: Email doesn't show you capacity. One reviewer might be buried while another has the bandwidth to help, but without a central dashboard, that imbalance remains invisible.
Missed turnaround commitments: Whether it’s a public-facing deadline or an internal benchmark, email won't alert you when a project is about to go "into the red." It simply sits in an inbox.
Your plan reviewers aren't disorganized. They’re simply using the wrong tool. Email was built for messaging, not for managing a deadline-driven, multi-departmental review process.
Effective plan management requires a single source of truth where:
Every active plan set has a live status.
Every reviewer has a visible, manageable queue.
Leadership can see what’s moving (and what isn’t) without sending a single status update email.
The chaos of email routing and the frustration of manual markups usually go hand-in-hand. Transitioning to a dedicated electronic plan review (ePR) system like e-PlanSoft replaces manual guesswork with intelligent, automated workflows that keep your team focused on safety and compliance, not administrative troubleshooting.
If you want to see what that looks like, we're happy to show you.
Last year, The New York Times published a story with a provocative title:“Your A.I. Radiologist Will Not Be With You Soon”.
There is a natural temptation when people start to think about applying AI to plan review: Why don't we just put the smartest AI we can build at the...
We recently wrapped up one of the biggest product pushes in e-PlanSoft’s history, putting the finishing touches on our new Plan Review Experience...
1 min read
In almost every planning department, there's someone who feels like the babysitter for the plan review process. Their job is hyper-tactical. Chasing...
1 min read
We just got back from the 2026 National Planning Conference in Detroit, where we spent most of the week walking the floor, listening to different...
1 min read
Key Takeaways The true cost of plan resubmittals is the cognitive load required of reviewers to re-establish context and re-construct project...